| Uploader: | Tanris |
| Date Added: | 27 March 2015 |
| File Size: | 51.87 Mb |
| Operating Systems: | Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X |
| Downloads: | 23699 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
ATI Confirms Havok Physics Solution
PhysX isn't implemented into it yet. Imagine swirling mist and smoke so interactive that it washes behind you as your character runs through it. The ATI model will compete with the PhysX chip from Ageia, which claims that its own chip can acceleratecomplex object interactions per second.
Archived from the original on Post a Comment Comment. Is it just me that thinks things are getting a little silly these days, 3x Vod cards and a Watt PSU, no wonder were experiencing Global Warming!
Havkk site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Your name or email address: If you have been in this business for some time you know how to value such statements Or would the physics engines remain hardware agnostic even though they are owned and developed by rival hardware makers?
Ageia face a real struggle now - particularly in light of their terrible launch rubbish performance in GRAW for example and that many developers already happy with using havok in software will find this a more appeal transistion.
There's a video on: It wasn't all that fast, yet, but it did work seamlessly.
Intel(Havok) and AMD(ATI) - Unity Forum
That's what worried me when I saw this. Where do you want to go today?
ATI only has to do it. Well depends on the graphic card creators.
I wonder what nVidia is going to pull out the bag? I think I said it before when Ageia's stuff was in the news - they're unlikely to be at the forefront of physics in games as the big boys like ATI have far more power in terms of marketing to both the end user and the developer. Game physics Procedural animation Ragdoll physics.
Even if owned by Intel, Intel does not have the technology needed for this and Havoc definitely is a profitable, future oriented investment for Intel and one of the best ai they can hardcore test their upcomming graphics technologies for the desired high parallel execution it will need to have. On September 14,Intel announced it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Havok Inc. What was impressive was the speed with which the code was written to be usable with OpenCL.
Hagok Havok SDK is multi-platform by nature and is always updated to run on the majority of the latest platforms.
ATi and Havok, one standard for all
The turnaround on this was pretty impressive coming in at a matter of a few weeks. The Havok middleware suite consists of the following modules: Regarding PTX i guess it's somehow wise not getting in contact with Pumiliotoxin.
On October 2,Microsoft announced it had acquired Havok. ArasJun 13, Log in Create a Unity ID. Want to provide direct feedback to the Unity team? This newsletter may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links.
404 Not Found
It's said that DirectX11 should offer a standad for GPU programming, maybe they'll even manage to take care of a standard physics interface as well, who knows, it's Microsoft. DreamoraJun 13, Is there any indication that the physics engines will become tied to hardware, so then if you choose a particular physics engine, you will have optimized performance on one kind of hardware and cripple performance on the other?
By reading this site you agree to our cookie policy.
Comments
Post a Comment